Local AI Stats.
Skip to content

Liquid AI · MODEL RECORD

LFM3-1.7B

LFM3-1.7B has 1.729 billion total parameters. The selected Q4_K_M GGUF file is 1.1 GB.

Data snapshot: . 4 published tests in this catalog.

COMPARE MEMORY OPTIONS

Computers for LFM3-1.7B

These configurations pass a weight-size check for the 1.10 GB file. Compare the platforms, then check the exact Amazon listing.

Change platform or budget ↗

Weight size is not tested compatibility or speed. Check runtime support and memory for context before buying. Prices are dated references. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

How these options are selected

Up to three platforms, with the lowest dated reference price on each. Unknown prices follow known prices. Each memory pool keeps a reserve: 30% (minimum 2 GB) for system or unified memory; 20% (minimum 1 GB) for dedicated VRAM. System RAM is for CPU inference. This check does not establish GPU allocation, software support or context capacity.

Model file and details

Provider
Liquid AI
Total parameters
1,728,801,536
Exact file size
1,099,627,808 bytes
Quantization / precision
Q4_K_M
Weight repository
LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF
Original model repository
LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B
Weight revision
bad5729bba61d076fff20d2548e62526665af215
Model revision
ac2586a34f1a1c03329dbdcdefabd8b6478ddaa7
Runtime notes
Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner.
Recorded release date
2026-10-27
Date evidence
Liquid AI LFM3 family announcement dated 27 October 2026; official source and GGUF model cards reviewed on 28 October. Exact source parameter count includes modality encoders; the language GGUF metadata count excludes separate encoders. Pretrained Base checkpoint is a separate fine-tuning starting point, not this chat model.

LFM3-1.7B-Q4_K_M.gguf

GGUF file and download on Hugging Face · Original model card

Published benchmark results

These scores were compiled from the linked sources. These published scores were not independently tested here. Different prompts, precision, thinking budgets and tools can change results.

GPQA Diamond

63.37 / 100

Hard science questions. This is a science reasoning test, not an overall intelligence score.

Benchmark efficiency: 57.629 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Liquid AI BF16 source evaluation with vLLM at 262,144-token context. Temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95; no output cap beyond full context. IFEval strictness and exact harness revisions are not stated.

Publisher source-checkpoint result, not an independent evaluation or a measurement of the selected quantized file. No repeated-run confidence interval is supplied. File size covers language weights only; it is not runtime RAM. Allow additional memory for context, runtime and media. LFM Open License v1.0 applies; commercial use at or above the defined USD 10 million annual-revenue threshold needs a separate license. Text chat, tools and local agents; 262,144-token source limit. Not recommended by the publisher for complex agentic coding or multi-step reasoning. Requires llama.cpp b11960/v0.8.0 or newer, or an app engine with LFM3 support. Q4_K_M is not the separately trained QAD Q4_0 artifact.

Read the GPQA Diamond source

LiveCodeBench v6

73.46 / 100

Solving coding problems. Version 6 only; published pass rates can vary with generation settings.

Benchmark efficiency: 66.804 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Liquid AI BF16 source evaluation with vLLM at 262,144-token context. Temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95; no output cap beyond full context. IFEval strictness and exact harness revisions are not stated.

Publisher source-checkpoint result, not an independent evaluation or a measurement of the selected quantized file. No repeated-run confidence interval is supplied. File size covers language weights only; it is not runtime RAM. Allow additional memory for context, runtime and media. LFM Open License v1.0 applies; commercial use at or above the defined USD 10 million annual-revenue threshold needs a separate license. Text chat, tools and local agents; 262,144-token source limit. Not recommended by the publisher for complex agentic coding or multi-step reasoning. Requires llama.cpp b11960/v0.8.0 or newer, or an app engine with LFM3 support. Q4_K_M is not the separately trained QAD Q4_0 artifact.

Read the LiveCodeBench v6 source

IFEval · reported

96.66 / 100

Following precise instructions. These cards report IFEval without consistently specifying prompt-level versus instruction-level scoring. Treat this view as approximate.

Benchmark efficiency: 87.902 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Liquid AI BF16 source evaluation with vLLM at 262,144-token context. Temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95; no output cap beyond full context. IFEval strictness and exact harness revisions are not stated.

Publisher source-checkpoint result, not an independent evaluation or a measurement of the selected quantized file. No repeated-run confidence interval is supplied. File size covers language weights only; it is not runtime RAM. Allow additional memory for context, runtime and media. LFM Open License v1.0 applies; commercial use at or above the defined USD 10 million annual-revenue threshold needs a separate license. Text chat, tools and local agents; 262,144-token source limit. Not recommended by the publisher for complex agentic coding or multi-step reasoning. Requires llama.cpp b11960/v0.8.0 or newer, or an app engine with LFM3 support. Q4_K_M is not the separately trained QAD Q4_0 artifact.

Read the IFEval · reported source

BFCL v4

71.39 / 100

Choosing and calling functions. Published BFCL v4 scores; tool environments and settings differ.

Benchmark efficiency: 64.922 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Liquid AI BF16 source evaluation with vLLM at 262,144-token context. BFCL V4 uses greedy decoding and up to 32,768 output tokens.

Publisher source-checkpoint result, not an independent evaluation or a measurement of the selected quantized file. No repeated-run confidence interval is supplied. File size covers language weights only; it is not runtime RAM. Allow additional memory for context, runtime and media. LFM Open License v1.0 applies; commercial use at or above the defined USD 10 million annual-revenue threshold needs a separate license. Text chat, tools and local agents; 262,144-token source limit. Not recommended by the publisher for complex agentic coding or multi-step reasoning. Requires llama.cpp b11960/v0.8.0 or newer, or an app engine with LFM3 support. Q4_K_M is not the separately trained QAD Q4_0 artifact.

Read the BFCL v4 source

Memory and comparison limits

Context and version evidence: The repository and file name identify the selected model. Revision hashes are shown above when recorded. Tested context length, full hardware configuration and run date are not consistently recorded in this snapshot. Only settings explicitly stated in each benchmark record are known.

The 1.1 GB figure covers model weights in this file. It excludes the context cache, runtime, operating system and any separate multimodal files. It is not a measured RAM requirement or a token-generation speed.

Use the model ranking chart to compare one test at a time. Use the 8, 16 and 32 GB memory guide. Check hardware memory and bandwidth before choosing a model.

RAM and VRAM planning for LFM3-1.7B

Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner. The selected weights use 1.1 GB; this excludes context cache, runtime buffers and other programs.

System RAM (CPU inference)
4 GB planning tier · 2 GB initial weight budget
Dedicated VRAM
4 GB planning tier · 3 GB initial weight budget
Unified memory
4 GB planning tier · 2 GB initial weight budget

These are the first listed tiers that pass our reserve policy, not measured minimum requirements. System RAM and VRAM remain separate. Use the memory tool to change the reserve for your context and runner.

Related models with shared benchmark coverage

Compare by memory and task · Browse the full model directory