Local AI Stats.
Skip to content

Nanbeige · MODEL RECORD

Nanbeige4.3-33B

Nanbeige4.3-33B has 33.119 billion total parameters. The selected Q4_K_M GGUF file is 20.789 GB.

Data snapshot: . 3 published tests in this catalog.

COMPARE MEMORY OPTIONS

Computers for Nanbeige4.3-33B

These configurations pass a weight-size check for the 20.79 GB file. Compare the platforms, then check the exact Amazon listing.

Change platform or budget ↗

Weight size is not tested compatibility or speed. Check runtime support and memory for context before buying. Prices are dated references. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

How these options are selected

Up to three platforms, with the lowest dated reference price on each. Unknown prices follow known prices. Each memory pool keeps a reserve: 30% (minimum 2 GB) for system or unified memory; 20% (minimum 1 GB) for dedicated VRAM. System RAM is for CPU inference. This check does not establish GPU allocation, software support or context capacity.

Model file and details

Provider
Nanbeige
Total parameters
33,118,977,024
Exact file size
20,788,825,216 bytes
Quantization / precision
Q4_K_M
Weight repository
bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF
Original model repository
Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B
Weight revision
9beb68421fdf7be095093a6888325fa2c83ddd38
Model revision
c1093c501cc6460427c0ac634db7223d0450c0ee
Runtime notes
Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner.
Recorded release date
2026-10-24
Date evidence
Source repository created 2026-10-24; availability basis, not a proven announcement date. Apache-2.0. Bartowski complete Q4_K_M language weights. Source scores are not measured quantized quality. Check runtime support; no vision projector or speculative draft is included.

Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-Q4_K_M.gguf

GGUF file and download on Hugging Face · Original model card

Published benchmark results

These scores were compiled from the linked sources. These published scores were not independently tested here. Different prompts, precision, thinking budgets and tools can change results.

GPQA Diamond

89.5 / 100

Hard science questions. This is a science reasoning test, not an overall intelligence score.

Benchmark efficiency: 4.305 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Highest thinking effort with preserve_thinking=true; reasoning settings temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, max new tokens 262144. Repeat count not stated.

Publisher result; no independent replication or confidence interval supplied. Apache-2.0. Bartowski complete Q4_K_M language weights. Source scores are not measured quantized quality. Check runtime support; no vision projector or speculative draft is included. Weight size excludes runtime and KV-cache memory; this is not a measured device-fit or speed result.

Read the GPQA Diamond source

AIME 2026

95.2 / 100

Competition math from AIME 2026. Published answer accuracy.

Benchmark efficiency: 4.579 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Highest thinking effort, preserve_thinking=true. Reasoning settings temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, max new tokens 262144. Repeat count not stated.

Publisher result; no independent replication or confidence interval supplied. Apache-2.0. Bartowski complete Q4_K_M language weights. Source scores are not measured quantized quality. Check runtime support; no vision projector or speculative draft is included. Weight size excludes runtime and KV-cache memory; this is not a measured device-fit or speed result.

Read the AIME 2026 source

Terminal-Bench 2.1

80.9 / 100

Agentic terminal-use task success. Publisher-reported percentages are retained, but agent scaffold, tools, timeouts and reasoning budget can materially affect results.

Benchmark efficiency: 3.892 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Terminus 2, highest thinking effort, preserve_thinking=true; agent sampling temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, max new tokens 65536. Repeat count not stated.

Publisher result; no independent replication or confidence interval supplied. Apache-2.0. Bartowski complete Q4_K_M language weights. Source scores are not measured quantized quality. Check runtime support; no vision projector or speculative draft is included. Weight size excludes runtime and KV-cache memory; this is not a measured device-fit or speed result.

Read the Terminal-Bench 2.1 source

Memory and comparison limits

Context and version evidence: The repository and file name identify the selected model. Revision hashes are shown above when recorded. Tested context length, full hardware configuration and run date are not consistently recorded in this snapshot. Only settings explicitly stated in each benchmark record are known.

The 20.789 GB figure covers model weights in this file. It excludes the context cache, runtime, operating system and any separate multimodal files. It is not a measured RAM requirement or a token-generation speed.

Use the model ranking chart to compare one test at a time. Use the 8, 16 and 32 GB memory guide. Check hardware memory and bandwidth before choosing a model.

RAM and VRAM planning for Nanbeige4.3-33B

Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner. The selected weights use 20.789 GB; this excludes context cache, runtime buffers and other programs.

System RAM (CPU inference)
32 GB planning tier · 22.4 GB initial weight budget
Dedicated VRAM
32 GB planning tier · 25.6 GB initial weight budget
Unified memory
32 GB planning tier · 22.4 GB initial weight budget

These are the first listed tiers that pass our reserve policy, not measured minimum requirements. System RAM and VRAM remain separate. Use the memory tool to change the reserve for your context and runner.

Related models with shared benchmark coverage

Compare by memory and task · Browse the full model directory