Local AI Stats.
Skip to content

Qwen · MODEL RECORD

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 has 30.532 billion total parameters. The selected Q4_K_M GGUF file is 18.557 GB.

Data snapshot: . 7 published tests in this catalog.

Model file and details

Provider
Qwen
Total parameters
30,532,122,624
Exact file size
18,556,686,752 bytes
Quantization / precision
Q4_K_M
Weight repository
unsloth/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-GGUF
Original model repository
Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
Weight revision
eea7b2be5805a5f151f8847ede8e5f9a9284bf77
Model revision
0d7cf23991f47feeb3a57ecb4c9cee8ea4a17bfe
Runtime notes
Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner.
Recorded release date
2025-07-28
Date evidence
Source repository createdAt (release-date proxy)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf

GGUF file and download on Hugging Face · Original model card

Published benchmark results

These scores were compiled from the linked sources. These published scores were not independently tested here. Different prompts, precision, thinking budgets and tools can change results.

MMLU-Pro

78.4 / 100

Knowledge and reasoning across many subjects. Published accuracy; different evaluation settings can change the result.

Benchmark efficiency: 4.225 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: MMLU-Pro.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the MMLU-Pro source

LiveCodeBench v6

43.2 / 100

Solving coding problems. Version 6 only; published pass rates can vary with generation settings.

Benchmark efficiency: 2.328 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher LiveCodeBench v6 result for February–May 2025 tasks, exact model column. Original weights; selected GGUF not independently tested.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the LiveCodeBench v6 source

IFEval · reported

84.7 / 100

Following precise instructions. These cards report IFEval without consistently specifying prompt-level versus instruction-level scoring. Treat this view as approximate.

Benchmark efficiency: 4.564 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: IFEval.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the IFEval · reported source

AIME 2025

61.3 / 100

Competition math from AIME 2025. Published answer accuracy.

Benchmark efficiency: 3.303 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: AIME25.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the AIME 2025 source

GPQA · variant unspecified

70.4 / 100

These cards say GPQA without naming the variant. Kept separate from confirmed GPQA Diamond results.

Benchmark efficiency: 3.794 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: GPQA.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the GPQA · variant unspecified source

MMLU-Redux

89.3 / 100

Revised MMLU knowledge test. Kept separate from original MMLU and MMLU-Pro.

Benchmark efficiency: 4.812 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: MMLU-Redux.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the MMLU-Redux source

BFCL v3

65.1 / 100

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard version 3. Kept separate from version 4.

Benchmark efficiency: 3.508 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher-reported results for this exact source model. Evaluation settings differ across model cards; the selected GGUF has not been independently retested. Table row: BFCL-v3.

Published point estimate, not an independent head-to-head evaluation. Quantization and inference settings can change results.

Read the BFCL v3 source

Memory and comparison limits

Context and version evidence: The repository and file name identify the selected model. Revision hashes are shown above when recorded. Tested context length, full hardware configuration and run date are not consistently recorded in this snapshot. Only settings explicitly stated in each benchmark record are known.

The 18.557 GB figure covers model weights in this file. It excludes the context cache, runtime, operating system and any separate multimodal files. It is not a measured RAM requirement or a token-generation speed.

Use the model ranking chart to compare one test at a time. Use the 8, 16 and 32 GB memory guide. Check hardware memory and bandwidth before choosing a model.

Need a computer for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507?

These complete configurations pass the initial weight-size check for the selected 18.56 GB file. Allow extra memory for context and software. Check the model’s runtime notes and your inference software before buying.

CPU inference

GMKtec K15 · 32GB

Core Ultra 5 125U, 32GB DDR5-4800 (2 x 16GB), 512GB PCIe 4.0 SSD

$669.99Dated reference · not a live offer

32 GB system RAM · CPU planning

Low-power CPU and shared graphics limit heavy inference.

Check price on Amazon ↗Specifications & model limits
Listing and price evidence

Listing evidence: 2026-09-25. Amazon.com base price visible in an owner-supplied screenshot reviewed 25 Sep 2026; capture time not supplied. Dated reference, not a live quote. Excludes card signup offers, coupons, tax and shipping.

Apple unified memory

Apple Mac Studio M5 Max · 36GB

18-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 36GB unified memory, 512GB SSD

$2,499.00Dated reference · not a live offer

36 GB unified memory

Fixed 36GB memory and internal storage; no CUDA support; price is a manufacturer reference rather than a verified Amazon offer.

Check price on Amazon ↗Specifications & model limits
Listing and price evidence

Listing evidence: 2026-10-02. Apple US launch price for the base M5 Max Mac Studio, published 22 September 2026: USD 2,499. Dated manufacturer reference, not an Amazon offer; tax and shipping may differ.

AMD unified memory

GMKtec EVO-X2

Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64GB LPDDR5X-8000, 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD

$2,199.99Dated reference · not a live offer

64 GB unified memory

Memory is soldered and shared with the operating system.

Check price on Amazon ↗Specifications & model limits
Listing and price evidence

Listing evidence: 2026-09-24. GMKtec, EVO-X2 / 64GB / 1TB, recorded 22 Sep 2026; exact ASIN capacity identified 24 Sep. This is a dated reference, not a current Amazon price; tax, shipping and bundle contents may differ.

Memory matches are estimates, not tested compatibility or speed. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Compare more computers for this model

RAM and VRAM planning for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner. The selected weights use 18.557 GB; this excludes context cache, runtime buffers and other programs.

System RAM (CPU inference)
32 GB planning tier · 22.4 GB initial weight budget
Dedicated VRAM
24 GB planning tier · 19.2 GB initial weight budget
Unified memory
32 GB planning tier · 22.4 GB initial weight budget

These are the first listed tiers that pass our reserve policy, not measured minimum requirements. System RAM and VRAM remain separate. Use the memory tool to change the reserve for your context and runner.

Related models with shared benchmark coverage

Compare by memory and task · Browse the full model directory