Local AI Stats.
Skip to content

webAI · MODEL RECORD

TwIL-8B Balanced

TwIL-8B Balanced has 8.792 billion total parameters. The selected Q4_K_M GGUF file is 5.348 GB.

Data snapshot: . 6 published tests in this catalog.

COMPARE MEMORY OPTIONS

Computers for TwIL-8B Balanced

These configurations pass a weight-size check for the 5.35 GB file. Compare the platforms, then check the exact Amazon listing.

Change platform or budget ↗

Weight size is not tested compatibility or speed. Check runtime support and memory for context before buying. Prices are dated references. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

How these options are selected

Up to three platforms, with the lowest dated reference price on each. Unknown prices follow known prices. Each memory pool keeps a reserve: 30% (minimum 2 GB) for system or unified memory; 20% (minimum 1 GB) for dedicated VRAM. System RAM is for CPU inference. This check does not establish GPU allocation, software support or context capacity.

Model file and details

Provider
webAI
Total parameters
8,791,592,960
Exact file size
5,347,917,568 bytes
Quantization / precision
Q4_K_M
Weight repository
webAI-Official/TwIL-8B
Original model repository
webAI-Official/TwIL-8B
Weight revision
58d49f0d9909e62f9c2fb09e99fc5c76f3f2d630
Model revision
58d49f0d9909e62f9c2fb09e99fc5c76f3f2d630
Runtime notes
Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner.
Recorded release date
2026-10-14
Date evidence
HF source repository creation date, not a verified public launch date. Current balanced artifact and model card reviewed on 6 November 2026.

TwIL-8B-Q4_K_M-balanced.gguf

GGUF file and download on Hugging Face · Original model card

Published benchmark results

These scores were compiled from the linked sources. These published scores were not independently tested here. Different prompts, precision, thinking budgets and tools can change results.

GPQA Diamond

70.2 / 100

Hard science questions. This is a science reasoning test, not an overall intelligence score.

Benchmark efficiency: 13.127 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the GPQA Diamond source

IFEval · reported

91.8 / 100

Following precise instructions. These cards report IFEval without consistently specifying prompt-level versus instruction-level scoring. Treat this view as approximate.

Benchmark efficiency: 17.166 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the IFEval · reported source

AIME 2025

88.3 / 100

Competition math from AIME 2025. Published answer accuracy.

Benchmark efficiency: 16.511 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the AIME 2025 source

AIME 2026

88.3 / 100

Competition math from AIME 2026. Published answer accuracy.

Benchmark efficiency: 16.511 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the AIME 2026 source

HMMT February 2026

68.2 / 100

Competition math from the February 2026 HMMT.

Benchmark efficiency: 12.753 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the HMMT February 2026 source

MATH-500

98.2 / 100

Math reasoning over all 500 problems. Published exact answer accuracy.

Benchmark efficiency: 18.362 published score points per GB of selected weights. This ratio is not an inference-speed measure; check the test settings to see whether the score covers the selected quantization.

Test settings: Publisher internal high-effort pass@1 with thinking enabled, balanced variant. Full MATH-500 and single-year AIME sets; GPQA explicitly means Diamond. IFEval strictness is not stated.

Publisher-reported source-checkpoint result; not an independent test or a score measured on this Q4_K_M file. No confidence interval is supplied. Download bytes cover language weights, not total runtime memory. English reasoning model; 131,072-token context. webAI Non-Commercial License v1.0. Balanced and verbose use different checkpoints: scores must not be transferred between them. Exact decoding settings, harness revision and repeated-run counts are not disclosed.

Read the MATH-500 source

Memory and comparison limits

Context and version evidence: The repository and file name identify the selected model. Revision hashes are shown above when recorded. Tested context length, full hardware configuration and run date are not consistently recorded in this snapshot. Only settings explicitly stated in each benchmark record are known.

The 5.348 GB figure covers model weights in this file. It excludes the context cache, runtime, operating system and any separate multimodal files. It is not a measured RAM requirement or a token-generation speed.

Use the model ranking chart to compare one test at a time. Use the 8, 16 and 32 GB memory guide. Check hardware memory and bandwidth before choosing a model.

RAM and VRAM planning for TwIL-8B Balanced

Confirm model architecture and quantization support in your runner. The selected weights use 5.348 GB; this excludes context cache, runtime buffers and other programs.

System RAM (CPU inference)
8 GB planning tier · 5.6 GB initial weight budget
Dedicated VRAM
8 GB planning tier · 6.4 GB initial weight budget
Unified memory
8 GB planning tier · 5.6 GB initial weight budget

These are the first listed tiers that pass our reserve policy, not measured minimum requirements. System RAM and VRAM remain separate. Use the memory tool to change the reserve for your context and runner.

Related models with shared benchmark coverage

Compare by memory and task · Browse the full model directory