Local AI Stats.
Skip to content

DATA-DRIVEN MODEL COMPARISON

Local LLM benchmark efficiency

Compare benchmark points per GB alongside Pareto trade-offs. A high score-to-size ratio alone does not select the best model.

Data snapshot: . Scores and weight sizes retain their original sources.

Check your own memory budget

First Pareto choice on MMLU-Pro

Qwen3.5-4B · 79.1 / 100 · 2.741 GB · Q4_K_M. This choice is calculated within this page’s eligible set.

MMLU-Pro: comparison

Knowledge and reasoning across many subjects. Published accuracy; different evaluation settings can change the result.

MMLU-Pro · GB = 1 billion bytes. Published scores may use different settings or precision.
Model / quantizationWeightsParametersScore / 100Score / GBSources
Qwen3.5-4BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice2.741 GB4.206B79.128.859Get weights
Score source
MiniCPM5 2BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice1.561 GB2.517B70.845.346Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-9BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice5.681 GB9.653B82.514.523Get weights
Score source
LFM2.5 230MQ4_K_M · Pareto choice0.153 GB0.23B20.25132.002Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-27BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice16.741 GB27.781B86.15.143Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.6-27BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice16.817 GB27.781B86.25.126Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQ4_K_M22.285 GB35.952B85.33.828Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-31B-itQ4_K_M18.324 GB31.273B85.24.65Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQ4_K_M22.135 GB35.952B85.23.849Get weights
Score source
Swift-Qwen3.8-27bQ4_K_M17.442 GB27.781B84.954.87Get weights
Score source
Seed-OSS-36B-InstructQ4_K_M21.762 GB36.151B82.73.8Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-26B-A4B-itQ4_K_M16.948 GB25.806B82.64.874Get weights
Score source
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BQ4_K_M25.477 GB32.913B81.943.216Get weights
Score source
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507Q4_K_M18.557 GB30.532B80.94.36Get weights
Score source
Aleph Alpha Kolibri-1Q4_K_M47.454 GB78.103B801.686Get weights
Score source
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Q4_K_M18.557 GB30.532B78.44.225Get weights
Score source
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BQ4_K_M24.574 GB31.578B78.33.186Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-12B-itQ4_K_M7.122 GB11.96B77.210.84Get weights
Score source
Granite 4.2 8BQ4_K_M5.348 GB8.792B74.0413.845Get weights
Score source
Tiel-Coder 35B-A3BUD-Q4_K_XL22.36 GB34.661B73.73.296Get weights
Score source
Gemma 4 E4BQ4_K_M4.977 GB7.996B69.413.944Get weights
Score source
Granite 4.2 3BQ4_K_M2.244 GB3.66B67.8430.232Get weights
Score source
LFM2.5 2.6BQ4_K_M1.674 GB2.697B65.238.938Get weights
Score source
Gemma 4 E2BQ4_K_M3.107 GB5.123B6019.313Get weights
Score source
Noema 2BQ8_02.012 GB1.882B51.125.397Get weights
Score source
Kernel Logic 1.5Q4_K_M4.683 GB7.616B388.114Get weights
Score source
Midnight-Miqu-70B-v1.5Q4_K_M41.423 GB68.977B31.390.758Get weights
Score source

LiveCodeBench v6: comparison

Solving coding problems. Version 6 only; published pass rates can vary with generation settings.

LiveCodeBench v6 · GB = 1 billion bytes. Published scores may use different settings or precision.
Model / quantizationWeightsParametersScore / 100Score / GBSources
Nanbeige 4.2 3BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice2.684 GB4.17B72.527.012Get weights
Score source
MiniCPM5 2BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice1.561 GB2.517B69.144.257Get weights
Score source
Granite 4.2 3BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice2.244 GB3.66B69.7131.065Get weights
Score source
Granite 4.2 8BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice5.348 GB8.792B73.2413.695Get weights
Score source
Mellum2.1 12B A2.5B ThinkingQ4_K_M · Pareto choice8.071 GB12.15B8210.159Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUFIQ3_XXS · Pareto choice10.094 GB26.896B84.578.378Get weights
Score source
K2 Horizon 0.9BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice0.666 GB1.078B37.456.141Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.8-27BQ4_K_M · Pareto choice16.464 GB27.781B90.35.485Get weights
Score source
Aleph Alpha Kolibri-1Q4_K_M47.454 GB78.103B85.91.81Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.6-27BQ4_K_M16.817 GB27.781B83.94.989Get weights
Score source
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27BQ4_K_M17.442 GB27.321B81.714.685Get weights
Score source
Swift-Qwen3.8-27bQ4_K_M17.442 GB27.781B81.554.675Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-27BQ4_K_M16.741 GB27.781B80.74.821Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQ4_K_M22.135 GB35.952B80.43.632Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-31B-itQ4_K_M18.324 GB31.273B804.366Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-26B-A4B-itQ4_K_M16.948 GB25.806B77.14.549Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQ4_K_M22.285 GB35.952B74.63.348Get weights
Score source
gemma-4-12B-itQ4_K_M7.122 GB11.96B7210.11Get weights
Score source
Seed-OSS-36B-InstructQ4_K_M21.762 GB36.151B67.43.097Get weights
Score source
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507Q4_K_M18.557 GB30.532B663.557Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-9BQ4_K_M5.681 GB9.653B65.611.548Get weights
Score source
GLM-4.7-FlashQ4_K_M18.312 GB31.221B643.495Get weights
Score source
Agents A1 4BQ4_K_M2.709 GB4.539B59.622.002Get weights
Score source
NeoHorse 1 4BQ4_K_M2.709 GB4.206B59.4321.94Get weights
Score source
LFM2.5 2.6BQ4_K_M1.674 GB2.697B59.4135.48Get weights
Score source
Qwen3.5-4BQ4_K_M2.741 GB4.206B55.820.358Get weights
Score source
Gemma 4 E4BQ4_K_M4.977 GB7.996B5210.448Get weights
Score source
Gemma 4 E2BQ4_K_M3.107 GB5.123B4414.163Get weights
Score source
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Q4_K_M18.557 GB30.532B43.22.328Get weights
Score source

How recommendations are calculated

We compare one benchmark at a time. A Pareto choice has no other scored model with both an equal or smaller weight file and an equal or higher score, with at least one strict improvement. The first choice is the frontier point nearest the chart’s top-left corner, using the same rounded memory scale and 0–100 score scale as the main chart. Other frontier choices follow, then other scored models by score.

Score per GB is shown for context; it does not choose the champion. Changing the budget or dataset can change the result. Scores are published point estimates, often for the source checkpoint rather than the selected quantization. They do not establish statistically significant differences or equal evaluation conditions.

RAM, VRAM and unified memory

Use one memory pool. System RAM is used for CPU inference; a dedicated GPU has separate VRAM. Do not add RAM and VRAM as if they were one GPU pool. Partial CPU offload needs a supported backend and can change speed. Unified memory is shared by CPU, GPU and the operating system; software can limit how much the GPU can allocate.

Our initial weight budget reserves 30% of system RAM or unified memory, with a minimum of 2 GB. For VRAM it reserves 20%, with a minimum of 1 GB. These are adjustable planning assumptions, not measured requirements. Context cache, runtime buffers, other programs, multimodal files and concurrent users can need more. A file that passes the budget check is a candidate, not a confirmed hardware-compatible configuration.

Check the model’s runtime and quantization support before downloading. See the Transformers cache documentation and llama.cpp backend documentation. GB uses decimal bytes; operating systems can report GiB instead.

Related memory tiers and tasks

All model records · Memory planning guide